东北大学学报(社会科学版)››2015,Vol. 17››Issue (1): 77-81.DOI:10.15936/j.cnki.10083758.2015.01.013

• 法学研究 •上一篇下一篇

专利楚奥的含义、影响及应对

徐升权

  1. (南京理工大学知识产权学院, 江苏南京210094)
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-12修回日期:2015-06-12出版日期:2015-01-25发布日期:2015-06-12
  • 通讯作者:徐升权
  • 作者简介:徐升权(1984),男,江苏泗阳人,南京理工大学讲师,法学博士,主要从事知识产权法研究。
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金资助项目(12YJA820011);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(30920130132015)。

On the Implications, Impact and Countermeasures of Patent Troll

XU Sheng-quan

  1. (School of Intellectual Property, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China)
  • Received:2015-06-12Revised:2015-06-12Online:2015-01-25Published:2015-06-12
  • Contact:-
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要:“专利楚奥”是实践中出现的一种特殊的专利权人,也可以指此类专利权人行使其专利权的现象。专利楚奥往往有“放任侵权”或“欺诈、要挟”之嫌,在导致一些企业受到巨额经济损失的同时也加剧了专利制度的“工具化”倾向,影响了专利诉讼制度等的健康运行。不过,专利楚奥也探索出了一种专利运营模式;因此,对其不能一味地予以反对或是支持。应对专利楚奥,可从专利性判断标准、专利权人不当行为的法律责任等方面来完善具体的专利法律制度。

关键词:专利楚奥,专利诉讼,专利运营

Abstract:Patent Troll refers to not only a specific type of patentees in practice, but also the phenomenon of patentees exercising patents. Patent Troll may be suspected of “indulging in infringement”or “fraud and coercion” causing some enterpriseshuge economic losses and intensifying the tool orientation of the patent system, which has affected the healthy operation of the patent litigation system. However, Patent Troll has also explored a model of patent operation; therefore, it couldnbe opposed or supported absolutely. To deal with Patent Troll, the patent legal system should be improved in terms of the judgment standards of patentability and the legal liability of patenteesmisconduct.

Key words:Patent Troll,patent litigation,patent operation

中图分类号:

Baidu
map