东北大学学报(社会科学版)››2021,Vol. 23››Issue (1): 18-23.DOI:10.15936/j.cnki.1008-3758.2021.01.003

• 科技哲学研究 •上一篇下一篇

技术统治:马尔库塞与福柯的分析

赵庆波

  1. (山东大学哲学与社会发展学院,山东济南250000)
  • 发布日期:2021-02-08
  • 通讯作者:赵庆波
  • 作者简介:赵庆波(1989-),男,甘肃庆阳人,山东大学博士研究生,主要从事技术哲学研究。
  • 基金资助:
    欧盟2020远景规划资助项目(741716)。

Technological Domination: An Analysis of Marcuse and Foucault

ZHAO Qingbo

  1. (School of Philosophy and Social Development, Shandong University, Jinan 250000, China)
  • Published:2021-02-08
  • Contact:-
  • About author:-
  • Supported by:
    -

摘要:马尔库塞与福柯的工作为分析资本主义与技术新配置之间的互动关系提供了经典的案例。马尔库塞指认技术操控了政治、经济、文化生活的各个领域,决定了人的感情、需要、愿望,造就了一个单向度的社会。福柯指出技术设计实现了将不同物质功能化处理的权力效应,其最终落点在于调配、控制、利用人与人之间的关系,技术使得权力统治从威严的政治机构散布到了日常生活,技术规训成为了日常生活中权力组织的新形式。面对技术统治的危机,马尔库塞与福柯提供了不同的解决方案。

关键词:技术统治; 技术规训; 单向度; 马尔库塞; 福柯

Abstract:The work of Marcuse and Foucault provided a classic case for analyzing the interaction between capitalism and the new allocation of technology. Marcuse pointed out that technology controls all fields of political, economic, and cultural life, determines human feelings, needs, and aspirations, and creates a one-dimensional society. Foucault pointed out that technical design realizes the power effect of functionalizing different substances, whose ultimate goal is to allocate, control, and utilize human relationships. Technology has allowed power rule to spread from majestic political institutions to daily life, and technical discipline has become a new form of power organization in daily life. Facing the crisis of technological domination, Marcuse and Foucault provided different solutions.

Key words:technological domination; technical discipline; one-dimensional; Herbert Marcuse; Michel Foucault

中图分类号:

Baidu
map